Incident Simulation: Running Tabletop Exercises for a Simultaneous Cloud Outage and Identity Attack

Start strong: When a cloud outage and identity attack collide, your teams must act as one

Cloud outages happen — and in 2026 they're getting messier. At the same time, automated identity fraud campaigns empowered by generative AI are scaling attacks across login APIs and account-creation flows. The real risk is the intersection: a simultaneous cloud outage that degrades authentication and an identity attack that exploits degraded defenses. This facilitator guide and tabletop scenario gives security, SRE, IAM, legal, and business teams a repeatable way to test cross-team readiness, decision-making, and playbook completeness.

Why run this simulation now (2026 context)

Recent industry signals make this tabletop urgent. The World Economic Forum's Cyber Risk in 2026 outlook highlights AI as a force multiplier for both attackers and defenders. Analysts in early 2026 reported spikes in outages across major providers, and research shows enterprises continue to underestimate identity risk costs by billions annually. In short: automated, AI-enhanced identity attacks are now likely to occur during noisy infrastructure events — and teams that don't practice the combined failure mode will be blindsided.

"Simultaneous failure modes are the new normal: cloud service instability + automated identity abuse."

Exercise objectives (what success looks like)

• Validate cross-team coordination between Security, SRE, IAM, Legal/Compliance, Product, and Communications.
• Test technical mitigations for auth resilience during partial cloud failures (cached tokens, emergency flows, read-only modes).
• Verify detection & response for automated identity fraud during degraded telemetry (reduced logs, delayed alerts).
• Confirm decision authority & comms for public-facing outage messaging while preserving investigation integrity.
• Produce actionable artifacts: incident timeline, RCA gaps, and updated cross-team playbook.

Who should attend (roles and headcount)

• 1-2 Incident Commanders (ICs) — rota from Security/SRE
• Security Ops lead + 2 analysts
• Platform/SRE lead + 2 engineers
• IAM/Identity lead + 1 engineer
• Product owner for affected services
• Legal/Privacy counsel
• Compliance/Audit representative
• Communications / PR lead
• Customer support lead
• Observer/evaluator(s) (optional)

Logistics & pre-reads

Run this tabletop as a 3–4 hour facilitated session. Circulate the following pre-reads 48–72 hours in advance:

• Current incident response playbooks for cloud outages and identity incidents
• Network architecture and dependency map (auth backends, SSO provider, API gateways)
• Recent runbooks for emergency account recovery and break-glass procedures
• Monitoring & logging scope (what is and isn't available during provider outages)

Scenario overview: 'Friday spike' combined incident

High level scenario: On a busy business day, a regional cloud control plane experiences a partial outage affecting authentication services and your CDN. Within 20 minutes, external telemetry shows a sudden flood of credential stuffing, synthetic account creation, and API abuse targeted at login endpoints and customer onboarding. The attackers use AI-generated synthetic identities and credential stuffing tools with rotating IPs.

Key assumptions

• Primary auth service (SSO/OIDC provider) in a degraded region; global DNS propagation delays hinder failover.
• Monitoring has partial visibility: logs are delayed by 5–15 minutes for some services.
• Customer-facing systems degrade to read-only mode for several services.
• Attackers use automated, AI-generated KYC for false accounts to bypass legacy checks.

Primary objectives for participants

1. Protect existing customer accounts and identify fraudulent account creations.
2. Restore resilient authentication pathways or safe degraded-mode flows.
3. Manage public communication without exposing investigation details.
4. Decide on containment vs. availability trade-offs.

Detailed inject timeline (facilitator script)

Below is a time-boxed sequence of injects. The facilitator reads each inject and then gives teams 10–20 minutes to respond and document decisions. Capture decisions, actions, and unresolved questions.

T0 — 00:00 (Initial alert)

Inject: On-call SRE receives alerts: auth provider latency spikes, SSO errors for 30% of logins, and CDN errors for a subset of edge locations. Downstream microservices show increased 500 errors.

Prompt: What immediate checks do SRE and Security run? Who is the incident commander? Initiate the war room. Identify which services to place in read-only mode.

T0 + 15m — 00:15 (Identity noise)

Inject: Security Ops reports a sudden rise in failed login attempts and thousands of new account creations from suspicious IP clusters. Fraud scoring flag rate increases. Some accounts show successful KYC approval via third-party vendor.

Prompt: What containment measures do you enact? Do you pause new account onboarding? Reconfigure rate limits, enable device fingerprinting, or force MFA enrollment? Who communicates with the KYC vendor?

T0 + 30m — 00:30 (Telemetry gap)

Inject: Logging ingestion lags and one of the SIEM collectors is unreachable. Analysts have near real-time alerts only for a subset of services.

Prompt: How do you prioritize investigation with limited telemetry? What manual evidence collection steps are taken? Which artifacts are immutable and how are they preserved for compliance?

T0 + 60m — 01:00 (Escalation)

Inject: Attackers succeed in using some compromised accounts to trigger password resets and initiate small-value fraudulent transfers within available read-write services. Customers report degraded login experience on social channels. External outage tracking sites report a major CDN/provider incident.

Prompt: Decide containment boundaries: block suspicious accounts, roll keys, revoke sessions, or shift to emergency auth fallback. How do you balance account safety with service availability? Who approves customer notifications?

T0 + 120m — 02:00 (Communications and legal)

Inject: The outage is public and press is asking about root cause. Privacy counsel warns of potential PII exposure due to fraud. Regulators might require notification depending on scope.

Prompt: Draft a short external statement. What must you avoid saying? What logs and timelines are needed for regulatory reporting?

T0 + 240m — 04:00 (Recovery & lessons)

Inject: Provider announces partial restoration. Some services return to normal. The attacker campaign shifts patterns; new account creation slows but previous fraudulent accounts remain.

Prompt: What are your next steps: remediation, customer remediation, credential resets, or full forensic analysis? Who drafts the post-incident report and assigns RCA owners?

Decision points & recommended technical actions (playbook snippets)

• Immediate containment: Enable adaptive rate limiting on auth endpoints, block suspicious IP ranges via WAF or CDN rules, and throttle new account creation flows.
• Preserve integrity: Snapshot current logs and store them in immutable storage (write-once) for compliance and forensic work, even if ingestion is degraded.
• Session control: Revoke high-risk sessions selectively using risk-based criteria; avoid blanket session invalidation unless necessary.
• Fallback auth: Activate emergency SSO fallback (local identity provider or cached JWT validation) for existing users while blocking new signups.
• Credential hygiene: Rotate service tokens/keys that may be in scope; document key rotation timelines and automated revocation scripts.
• MFA & passwordless: Force step-up or disable passwordless onboarding that relies on the degraded provider until validations are confirmed.
• KYC verification: Pause automated KYC acceptance for accounts created during the incident window; flag for manual review.

Operational playbook: Cross-team responsibilities

• Incident Commander: overall coordination, status updates, decision log.
• SRE/Platform: health checks, failover, DNS routing, traffic policies, cache invalidation.
• Security Ops: triage alerts, block lists, session revocation, forensic collection.
• IAM: emergency auth flows, token revocation, MFA enforcement.
• Product: user experience choices (read-only vs. degraded), feature toggles.
• Legal & Compliance: regulator notification, data breach risk assessment, evidence preservation.
• Communications: internal updates, customer-facing messages, media liaison.
• Customer Support: FAQs, incident scripts, escalations for impacted customers.

Scoring rubric & exercise debrief (how to evaluate)

After the exercise, use a 1–5 scale across key dimensions and capture evidence:

• Detection speed: time from alert to identification of combined incident
• Containment effectiveness: percent of automated attacks blocked within first hour
• Availability trade-offs: customer-impacted functionality and downtime
• Communication clarity: time to first public statement and adherence to legal guidance
• Forensics readiness: ability to produce immutable logs and timeline for investigators

Recommended pass criteria: average score >=4 across categories, with critical items (forensics, containment, and communications) scoring at least 3.

Post-incident artifacts & remediation checklist

Require concrete outputs within 7–14 days post-exercise:

• Incident timeline with decision log and timestamps
• Root cause analysis (RCA) draft and owners for each remediation
• Updated combined playbook for cloud + identity incidents
• Customer remediation plan and legal notifications (if needed)
• Changes to monitoring: add synthetic auth checks, burst-rate anomaly detectors, and drift monitoring for KYC vendor integrations

Practical hardening actions to implement after the drill

1. Deploy short-lived credentials and automated rotation for service-to-service tokens.
2. Introduce cached auth validation logic to allow read-only session validation when the primary token introspection endpoint is unavailable.
3. Adopt behavioral and device risk signals to throttle or block automated identity abuse in real time.
4. Implement multi-provider KYC checks and manual review fallbacks for edge cases.
5. Test DNS and traffic failover regularly with synthetic load tests that include auth flows.
6. Train SOC analysts on AI-enhanced fraud patterns and integrate predictive models into detection pipelines.

Case study style vignette (realistic composite)

In late 2025, a mid-size fintech faced a partial CDN outage and within minutes saw an automated identity campaign create thousands of fake accounts using stolen credentials and AI-generated synthetic IDs. Because their runbook lacked a combined scenario, teams worked in silos: SRE focused on bringing services up, Security ratcheted up blocks that inadvertently affected legitimate traffic, and Communications issued a vague statement. Post-incident, the organization adopted the combined tabletop approach, implemented cached auth validation, and integrated device risk signals — reducing similar attack success rates by over 80% in subsequent drills.

Facilitator tips: keep the exercise rigorous and psychologically safe

• Run injects unpredictably and avoid over-steering responses; let teams fail to reveal gaps.
• Encourage transparent decision logs — the most valuable insights come from recorded trade-offs.
• Use observers to capture cross-team friction and handoff delays.
• End with a 'hotwash' — immediate 30-minute debrief to capture initial reactions before formal RCA.

2026 trends to include in your playbooks

• AI-driven attacks: plan for synthetic KYC, credential stuffing at scale, and prompt-engineered social engineering.
• Predictive defenses: integrate ML models that forecast attack windows and recommend automated mitigations.
• Regulatory intensity: prepare for faster notification windows and stronger expectations for forensic evidence.
• Multi-cloud resiliency: design auth and customer workflows to gracefully degrade across providers.

Actionable takeaways (do these this quarter)

1. Schedule and run this combined tabletop within 30 days with all stakeholder roles represented.
2. Implement one technical mitigation from the hardening list: cached auth validation or adaptive rate limits.
3. Update your incident playbooks to include combined failure-mode decision points and evidence preservation steps.
4. Measure and publish the tabletop scorecard and assign remediation owners with deadlines.

Closing: build resilience where it matters

Simulating a combined cloud outage and identity attack exposes brittle handoffs, incomplete playbooks, and technical gaps that single-failure drills miss. In 2026, with AI amplifying attack scale and cloud providers continuing to experience partial outages, cross-team tabletop exercises are no longer optional. They are the most efficient way to validate the people, process, and technology that protect your users and preserve trust.

Next step: Run the scenario, capture the decisions, and publish a prioritized remediation plan. If you want a ready-made facilitator kit (injects, slides, scoring templates, and postmortem checklist), request the keepsafe.cloud tabletop pack for combined cloud+identity incidents and start strengthening cross-team resilience today.

Related Reading

• How Small-Batch Cocktail Syrups Can Elevate Your Pizzeria Bar Program
• Checklist: What to Ask a CRM Vendor Before Integrating With Your Lease Management System
• Why a Shockingly Strong 2025 Economy Could Boost Returns in 2026
• Where to Find Community-Driven Add-ons and Accessories After Big Tech Pullbacks
• Preserving Virtual Worlds: NGOs, Fan Archives and the Ethics of Shutting Down Games